A novel X-Ray and γ-Ray combination strategy for potential dose escalation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) has long been calling for advances in technology of radiotherapy. Patients who received radiotherapy still had high risks of local recurrence, while suffering from gastrointestinal side effects. Based on the inherent characteristics of the x-ray and γ-Ray radiation techniques, here we proposed and investigated an unexplored radiation therapy. PURPOSE: To investigate the potential clinical benefit of a novel x-ray and γ-Ray combination radiation technique in patients with LAPC. METHODS: Retrospective intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans of 10 LAPC patients were randomly selected to compare with dual-modality plans. The prescribed dose to PGTV was 60.2 Gy. The PGTV dose was further escalated in dual-modality plan while maintaining clinically tolerable dose to organs at risk (OARs). Dosimetric comparisons were made and analyzed for three treatment plans (tomotherapy, standard dual-modality plan, escalated dual-modality plan) to assess the ability to increase dose to target volume while minimizing dose in adjacent OARs. Finally, radiobiological models were utilized for comparison. RESULTS: All strategies resulted in dosimetrically acceptable plans. Dual-modality plans were present with similar conformity index (CI) and significantly lower gradient index (GI) compared with tomotherapy (3.64 ± 0.37 vs. 4.14 ± 0.61, p = 0.002; 3.64 ± 0.42 vs. 4.14 ± 0.61, p = 0.003). Dmean of PGTV (65.46 ± 3.13 vs. 61.56 ± 1.00, p = 0.009; 77.98 ± 5.86 vs. 61.56 ± 1.00, p < 0.001) and PCTV (55.04 ± 2.14 vs. 53.93 ± 1.67, p = 0.016; 58.24 ± 3.24 vs. 53.93 ± 1.67, p = 0.001) were significantly higher, while Dmean of the stomach was reduced in both dual-modality plans (17.98 ± 10.23 vs. 19.34 ± 9.75, p = 0.024; 17.62 ± 9.92 vs. 19.34 ± 9.75, p = 0.040). The lower V30Gy in the liver (4.83 ± 5.87 vs. 6.23 ± 6.68, p = 0.015; 4.90 ± 5.93 vs. 6.23 ± 6.68, p = 0.016) and lower V45Gy of the small intestine (3.35 ± 3.30 vs. 4.06 ± 3.87, p = 0.052) were found in dual-modality plans. Meanwhile, radiobiological models demonstrated higher probability of tumor control (29.27% ± 9.61% vs. 18.34% ± 4.70%, p < 0.001; 44.67% ± 18.16% vs. 18.34% ± 4.70%, p = 0.001) and lower probability of small intestine complication (2.16% ± 2.30% vs. 1.25% ± 2.72%, p = 0.048) in favor of dual-modality strategy. CONCLUSIONS: A novel dual-modality strategy of x-ray and γ-Ray combination radiation appears reliable for target dose escalation and normal tissue dose reduction. This strategy might be beneficial for local tumor control and the protection of normal organs in patients with LAPC.

[The prevention and treatment of post-resectional live failure for hepatocellular carcinoma].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cause of liver failure after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma and explore its prevention and treatment. METHODS: The clinical data of 1000 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergone hepatectomy from July 2000 to June 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 922 male and 78 female, aging from 21 to 89 years old. RESULTS: Among the 1000 patients, there were 18 patients with liver failure after hepatectomy (1.8%). Among the 18 patients with liver failure, 13 patients were more than 65 years old, 14 patients were with more than 20% of indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes, 14 patients were with more than 1000 ml blood loss during operation, 6 patients were with F4/F3 liver fibrosis (Metavir Scores), and 9 patients were with less than 40.0% liver volume of residue liver. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with less than volume of residue liver, much more blood loss or transfusion, more than 20% of ICGR15, F4/F3 liver cirrhosis are prone to be with liver failure after hepatectomy. Artificial liver or liver transplantation may be the important alternative for liver failure after hepatectomy.